Here we are talking about a ball…

You would certainly listen, even if you don't have Netflix, if you haven't seen it, what is being said about Last Dance, the 10-hour documentary about the greatest basketball player of all time, perhaps even far from the second one, Michael Jordan. What did the greatest do? He took everything in the NBA, achieved the unrepeatable, to win three consecutive titles with the Bulls, in fact twice in the three years 91-93 and three years 96-98 and became MVP in the finals so many times and MVP 5 times in the regular season. . But here we are talking about a ball. So let's see, is there something similar in the ball?

If basketball's undisputed GOAT is the "airy" Jordan, in football the battle is more ambiguous. And the opinions of the many, the disagreements, give and take. Decades now. Maradona or Pele? Or maybe Cruyff? And Ronaldo? Ronaldinho? Cristiano or Messi? And Zlatan? The game against GOAT football has other features.

The CR7 bears a striking resemblance to the MJ in terms of its handling of its teammates, how much it can inspire and entice them. In addition, they have tremendous common features in terms of their medallions. Cristiano just can't help but feel lost. Cries. He doesn't accept that, my child. He wants to win, he wants to score. Remember the penalty shootout in the final overtime against Atletico in the Champions League final? How did he celebrate it? with "hookers" and tightening and other such things we said are graphic? Well, he didn't do it for the graphics of the case or to steal the glory from others. It is in his character to want to "kill" the opponent who challenges him. Even when he finds him dead!

Messi in his goggles. He is a born winner, but if he doesn't even sit down, "won't he go to the horn?" Whatever happens, we look at the next one. " He will not cry. We never saw him cry. Nor is he interested in putting a stone in a predetermined victory, as long as the victory itself is enough. Although it affects the team, it subjugates it to its individual -state- ego, but in a different way. In his own medal the word defeat exists. But when she comes, she won't cry to blame herself, she'll find the culprit elsewhere and she'll even eat him, underground if necessary. Mouchritsa the short!

Pele was the leader. The emperor. Neither Cristiano nor Messi. Although more similar to Argentina. He did not externalize his desires, he took them - perhaps rightly - from the natural flow of things.

Maradona? Another story. Rebel. Often for no reason. With his whores and coke, his relationship with the Mafia being a friendship. But that's how his ego is. He wanted victory to remain a cult, an idol, a god. For no other reason. He just enjoyed being in the picture.

Finally, Cruyff was the one who, above himself, with altruism that does not fit in such sizes, changed football more than anyone. Not by setting up a football dynasty, but also as a coach when he changed the way a football club works, with image and simulation parts from promin to professionals with total futsal, with gaming passing with, with, with…

Common feature of most? That they grew up with the top clubs in the world (Real, Barça, Manchester, Juve, etc.). With Brazil in the 70's, Pelé, the most important football team of all time! Only two made the difference. One, Cruyff, is more of a game changer, the one who gave another course in the history of football for a thousand reasons AND as a coach. But if anyone excelled, they made a superpower at the pan-European level a team off the map, it was Diego Armando Maradona. With the two championships and a cup that he "stole" himself from Inter, Juve, Milan, etc. And with the UEFA Cup he won with Partenopei. And to these we should add a World Cup and whatever other title he got in his career. But the fact that he took a city from the south of Italy made her empress makes him GOAT without a doubt. Even if he finally lost the derby against the abuses.

email> info@tipsmaker.net