It comes down after decades that you have been educated as a fan and as a team, a Savvidis. And he takes PAOK by the hand and raises it four levels. But PAOK is no longer "the one persecuted by the establishment of Athens". For years, not a short time, PAOK is part of everything. It co-shapes the conditions in which the others struggle. He is not outside and waiting for what others will say, he has a reason, he has substance, he has a special weight what PAOK will say as an organization. It is top no matter how big this top is. Top 2; Top 3; Top 4; Whoever is the protagonist in Greek football in recent years, for days Savvidis PAOK is part of this conglomerate and his opinion and his conversation are respected, listened to and feared by both his enemies and his friends. And this did not exist in the past.
And it seems that there are some in the fan core of Dikefalos who do not like to be on top and shapers of the whole situation. They like revolution for revolution, protest for protest. And the tsaboukades for the tsaboukades. Because that's why Makis the knife says it. And because the team was found to be losing in the goal and in the detail from the teammate Aris, the boys went inside to do everything ops. And it is now in danger of being lost all year and dynamite entering the foundations and the next ones.
And I come to ask now as a true heretic. If Ivan comes down and says "Fuck you, I give up everything and leave, I will not throw money in a bucket hole because some are assholes" then what will the boys have to say? Or do they think that the next day of Savvidis their team will still hold in their hands the power it holds today? If they think this, they will do well to ask the elders what they lived in the previous eras, what they lived in the administrations of Voulinos, Batatoudis, Goumenos, but mainly among them, etc.
And to close, there in the port, what do some drink? There was a whole commotion for the penalty that Olympiacos won in Volos. A penalty that was not in the end what made the match final. After Volos found an answer and equalized in 89 'but also Olympiakos said the last conversation with Valbouena from a foul in the 90th foul. How bad is it to admit that the penalty that was originally given was, let's not say monkey, let's say it was overdone? If there are hands? Obviously yes. But as much as the attacker puts his hand to gain space, so much the defender puts his hand to maintain his own. How come one is a penalty but the other is not a foul? You do not need to wear fan glasses to see them. It was a penalty that was given, but it was also a penalty that was missed so much that the opponents came out on the balconies and shouted for slaughter. If it had been given in the 25th minute, it would not have shaken a leaf. If it had been given in 80 'but with the score 3-0 you would not have heard a word. But of this severity penalty in the 80 fugitives with the score 0-0 and with the attacker having already pushed equivalents to take a position in the opposite, E, as much as you do it is a severely drawn challenge and reaches the limits of the invention to judge the result. Both in reality and in the eyes of your opponents. And it is not bad to admit the whore reality. Let's go and start speaking the same language in this place…
email> info@tipsmaker.net
