An announcement was issued, a decision was issued. The appeals committee of the EPO acquitted PAOK for the complaint of Olympiakos about multi-ownership with Xanthi. It is worth remembering that this case that erupted 13 months ago had found PAOK at the top of the standings one point ahead of Olympiacos. And he had found Xanthi to claim on equal terms its placement in European positions. And chaos ensued!
The newspaper says that Olympiacos claimed that it had evidence of a lot of ownership of Ivan Savvidis. That is, apart from PAOK, Savvidis was the shadow owner of Xanthi as well. Which is obviously against the terms of the competition. Olympiakos submitted these "proofs" to her and started the carousel. Let's not make it a fairy tale, but the big trick happened when the professional sports committee accepted the allegations of the red and whites and, observing the letter of the law, suggested the relegation of PAOK and Xanthi.
Beware, we are talking about a suggestion from a committee that examined some facts and came up with a conclusion. And hundreds of questions. What happens to the proposal, if it is binding, if there is a need for a legal basis, if in order to reach such an extreme measure the complainant or ESA's need to have solid evidence that will substantiate some serious principle and not amateur small investigators.
Do not make it a fairy tale, Minister Avgenakis intervened to "save" PAOK. What did he achieve? To provoke reactions not only from the complainants that he intervenes to save a group. But also from the defendants, that in a shaky case if there is no investigation and trial in substance, he intervenes to "save" her by bathing her with the verdict of the guilty, without proving in fact any guilt.
We all know the result. The whole championship was ruined, PAOK lost the title, Xanthi was relegated. PAOK, of course, appealed to CAS, but Xanthi did not. And the biceps of the North may have succeeded in sending the European judicial authority the case to be tried in its essence in Greece, but this does not affect the championship, nor the final score, nor the disgrace that Greek football ate.
OK, the decision came out that says that Maroupa's investigations and its costing in the Chalet lack not only professionalism, but also seriousness, the data examined by the committee may not have been judged as capable of proving multi-ownership, as the bad thing happened. The championship was essentially judged in a court decision. And worst of all, there is a team that is currently playing in Arta against Karaiskakia in the second division of the country. While until a year ago, until the day it started, this carousel claimed space and time to participate in European cups. And this team was disbanded, demoted, sold and now plays in the second division.
Well PAOK, a great team and a corner shop. He did not get a title. Klein. It is a club capable of getting dozens of others. Which is not exactly the case, but talkative to do. But this Xanthi, which lost the category and as it seems does not go up again this year, what phase? Innocent innocent, but he also ate Leza and lost the accusation and goes to dismantle the store, without being guilty - according to the decision we always talk like that? - for what the fuck they testified and threw her into this chaos. Nice justice oh, nice football…
email> info@tipsmaker.net
